Visit blatnym's column >>

BLATNYM

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 4
Member Since: 6/2008Last Seen: 10/28/2009

Study pins oil-price volatility on speculation

advertisement

An independent study of oil markets concludes that speculation by large investors was a primary reason for the surge in oil prices during the first half of the year and for the more recent price declines.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
5.1
1.6
1.5
Jump to discussion page: 1 2
{"commentId":2858035,"authorDomain":"blatnym"}

Was this study published in the journal Duh!

{"commentId":2858035,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"blatnym"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:12 PM EDT
{"commentId":2926471,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

I wonder how the republicans will lie about this study.

Oh I know, hire a blithering idiot to do his own study.

{"commentId":2926471,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"techie22"}
    #1.1 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":2858677,"authorDomain":"nativemedicfire"}

    we need a study to know we have been screwed come on how dumb are these people who run our government???

    they knew that the taxpaying public was being robbed and raped and now they will do nothing to them watch and see

    {"commentId":2858677,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"nativemedicfire"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:32 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2858902,"authorDomain":"gayle-2"}

    I heard with my own ears on MSNBC, CNBC, and CNN hundreds of oil company and wall street spokes people swear the oil price increase was NOT due to speculators. Why didn't any of these reporters inview someone who DOES NOT have a self interest so we could learn the truth six months ago. Reporters should make a note of these liars and NOT broadcast their "expert" opinions.

    {"commentId":2858902,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gayle-2"}
    • 3 votes
    Reply#3 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2926989,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

    You are right one the money. Speaking of money, the Republicans

    have stolen so much of it they can meet anyone's price for their soul.

    Even the Saudis were honest about it not being supply & demand.

    {"commentId":2926989,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"techie22"}
      #3.1 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":2859245,"authorDomain":"jsachse"}

      I think most normal people knew this was the cause 6 months ago. The sad thing is...it will happen again.

      {"commentId":2859245,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"jsachse"}
      • 3 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2859379,"authorDomain":"mrp0428"}

      Wow what a shock. Now that they can't use the real estate market to generate there huge profits they go to the next market that is not regulated enough to protect itself. When you have such large sums of money at there disposal and the pressure to generate such large profits you will always have the prospect of doing whatever it takes to make there money. I also agree that once again the financial media not only missed it but was a will 3rd party to it taking it so long to come out. How is this any different than the Ca energy crisis that ended up being caused by Enron????

      {"commentId":2859379,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"mrp0428"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#5 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2859394,"authorDomain":"bowz77"}

      Looks like a typo in one paragraph... it says Oil is trading @ $1.02 a barrel... Probably meant to say it's down $1.02... Didnt we learn from United =)~ Watch those typo's! LOL

      {"commentId":2859394,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"bowz77"}
        Reply#6 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:56 PM EDT
        {"commentId":2860274,"authorDomain":"drewinman"}

        Guys this is a report from a biased market participant who holds substantial interest in AMR Corp, General Motors, US Airways, UAL Corp and Delta Airlines. Please, just take it like most of the other biased research. I have attached a link to their latest SEC form 13f Holdings report.

        {"commentId":2860274,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"drewinman"}
          Reply#7 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2860373,"authorDomain":"drewinman"}

          Guess links dont work....

          FORM 13F INFORMATION TABLE TITLE OF VALUE SHARES/ SH/ PUT/ INVSTMT VOTING AUTHORITY
          NAME OF ISSUER CLASS CUSIP (X$1000) PRN AMT PRN CALL DSCRETN SOLE SHARED NONE

          ABITIBIBOWATER INC COM 003687100 4,665 500,000 SH SOLE 500,000 0 0
          ALCATEL-LUCENT SPONSORED ADR 013904305 6,040 1,000,000 SH SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          ALCATEL-LUCENT SPONSORED ADR 013904305 3,020 500,000 SH CALL SOLE 500,000 0 0
          ALCATEL-LUCENT SPONSORED ADR 013904305 3,020 500,000 SH CALL SOLE 500,000 0 0
          AMR CORP COM 001765106 5,091 994,400 SH CALL SOLE 994,400 0 0
          AMR CORP COM 001765106 5,120 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          AMR CORP COM 001765106 5,120 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION COM 060505104 23,870 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION COM 060505104 23,870 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          DELTA AIR LINES INC DEL COM NEW 247361702 11,400 2,000,000 SH SOLE 2,000,000 0 0
          EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES COM NEW 302051206 4,190 250,000 SH SOLE 250,000 0 0
          FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN COM 313586109 19,510 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          GANNETT INC COM 364730101 16,253 750,000 SH CALL SOLE 750,000 0 0
          GENERAL MTRS CORP COM 370442105 5,750 500,000 SH CALL SOLE 500,000 0 0
          GENERAL MTRS CORP COM 370442105 11,500 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          GENERAL MTRS CORP COM 370442105 11,500 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          GOOGLE INC CL A 38259P508 52,642 100,000 SH CALL SOLE 100,000 0 0
          GOOGLE INC CL A 38259P508 52,642 100,000 SH CALL SOLE 100,000 0 0
          LOUISIANA PAC CORP COM 546347105 2,547 300,000 SH CALL SOLE 300,000 0 0
          LOUISIANA PAC CORP COM 546347105 8,490 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          LOUISIANA PAC CORP COM 546347105 8,490 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          LOWES COS INC COM 548661107 20,750 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          MIRANT CORP NEW *W EXP 01/03/201 60467R118 9,045 500,000 SH SOLE 500,000 0 0
          NEOSE TECHNOLOGIES INC COM 640522108 600 2,000,000 SH SOLE 2,000,000 0 0
          NUCOR CORP COM 670346105 22,401 300,000 SH CALL SOLE 300,000 0 0
          OFFICE DEPOT INC COM 676220106 10,940 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          PFIZER INC COM 717081103 8,735 500,000 SH SOLE 500,000 0 0
          RADIOSHACK CORP COM 750438103 12,270 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          SANDISK CORP COM 80004c101 9,350 500,000 SH CALL SOLE 500,000 0 0
          SANDISK CORP COM 80004c101 9,350 500,000 SH CALL SOLE 500,000 0 0
          SATCON TECHNOLOGY CORP COM 803893106 4,970 1,750,000 SH SOLE 1,750,000 0 0
          SCHLUMBERGER LTD COM 806857108 53,232 495,500 SH CALL SOLE 495,500 0 0
          U S AIRWAYS GROUP INC COM 90341W108 10,000 4,000,000 SH SOLE 4,000,000 0 0
          UAL CORP COM NEW 902549807 5,220 1,000,000 SH SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          UAL CORP COM NEW 902549807 1,190 228,000 SH CALL SOLE 228,000 0 0
          WYETH COM 983024100 47,960 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          WYETH COM 983024100 47,960 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0
          WYETH COM 983024100 47,960 1,000,000 SH CALL SOLE 1,000,000 0 0

          {"commentId":2860373,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"drewinman"}
            #7.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2867926,"authorDomain":"cavicore"}

            It is pretty safe to assume that the OTHER 170 billion still 'invested' in the oil market from 2003 to the start of 2008, ran the price from 15 to 95. Get that out and you'll have $1 gallon gas. Again, the article states the obvious after the fact, but still not the whole story. The massive 'investment' was across the commodity market not just oil. Your paying 15 bucks for a pizza this year instead of 10 like you did last year because food commodity 'investment' is up 500% from last year not because of shortages. Take a look at the whold commodity market since mid July...down, down, down. The specs are leaving

            A former user, feman185 said it all along….until he got kicked off. @!$%#, the bastard even got the day of 7/15 right.

            {"commentId":2867926,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"cavicore"}
            • 1 vote
            #7.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:06 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":2860772,"authorDomain":"carl-seely"}

            It is no coincidence that all the current CFTC commisioners are Bush appointees. Lets get the wolves to guard the henhouse!!!!!! No coincidence there. I smell a rat. Thank the current recession on the Republicans screwing us over for alot of money....
            I guarantee that Bush will go down in history as the worst president in History.

            {"commentId":2860772,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"carl-seely"}
              Reply#8 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:46 PM EDT
              {"commentId":2861463,"authorDomain":"pmelse"}

              OMG! They 've just now figured this out? I've been saying this for months. I believe there used to be regulations on this type of investing since it helped cause the great depression but it was removed about 12 years ago. As with the mortgage regulations that were lifted around the same time. SO, Now that they have figured this evil plot out when do the rest of us get REIMBURSED???!!!!

              {"commentId":2861463,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"pmelse"}
              • 1 vote
              Reply#9 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:13 PM EDT
              {"commentId":2863495,"authorDomain":"avc3"}

              Let's see - 12 years ago? Hmm. Not Bush's fault. Guess who gets the blame?

              While he was bonkin Monica, Ben Laden and this occurred. What a champion!!!

              {"commentId":2863495,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"avc3"}
                #9.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2865544,"authorDomain":"itgranny"}

                Art-492724

                MAINTENANCE!!! (yes I'm yelling!) How many things in your life go for 12 years and never need to be looked at again.

                What would happen to your car if you drove it the normal 10,000 miles per year and never did any maintenance after 12 years. tires oil battery

                What would happen to your house if you didn't do a thing to it in 12 years. It would be a pig sty and condemned for one. The sinks leaking, the paint marked up etc.

                Do you believe that you tell your kid at 4 years old the set of rules and 12 years later (about 14) these rules won't change according to circumstance?

                We see this stuff happening yet nothing gets done about it. This should have been being monitored all along yet nothing was done. As soon as they were finding people abusing the law and finding loopholes that may not have been thought of before, they should be brought back and updated to reflect the current situation.

                {"commentId":2865544,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"itgranny"}
                • 1 vote
                #9.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2927057,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

                Al Gore would have monitored it.

                He would have encouraged the car companies to build fuel efficient cars

                and we'd be a world leader now.

                When Ari Flesher was asked about conservation after the first stolen election,

                he said, "That's a Big NO ! "

                Try to blame the dems all you'd like, those with a shread of intelligence and

                integrity know what the truth is and who's to blame for the current circumstances.

                {"commentId":2927057,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"techie22"}
                  #9.3 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":2862086,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

                  good report tells us what we all knew, the supply/demand was a lie. and quite frankly so is half this report.
                  they only focus on the NYSE. what about ICE?

                  and they fail to mention the who. who was pouring huge money into it? name names

                  {"commentId":2862086,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#10 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2927118,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

                  Those who would be named are too powerful and

                  are the types who would threaten your kids if you

                  told the truth. They'd just send one of their paid

                  mercs who have no soul and only worship money.

                  {"commentId":2927118,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"techie22"}
                    #10.1 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:59 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":2862702,"authorDomain":"celticprincess1746"}

                    I want to know why the hell we are still paying as if oil was $130/barrel!! In fact, prices per barrel dropped and yesterday, the gas price jumped $.10/gallon from when I left for work in the morning until I came home in the evening. What a joke!!

                    {"commentId":2862702,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"celticprincess1746"}
                      Reply#11 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:01 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":2863393,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                      The prices on the stock market are the prices oil is sold for THREE MONTHS FROM NOW. As such, we are still paying for about $135 a barrel.

                      This "article" is clearly biased, I don't think anyone can disput that. That being said, prices are dropping because people are driving less, and that in turn is chasing off the speculators in the market.

                      In a few months, sales of SUV's will start to recover, because $3.75 is bearable, and prices will start to rise yet again.

                      Also note: The price of oil always tends to fall prior to an election. Same thing happened in 2000 and 2004.

                      In short, this is a temporaty reduction in price, nothing more. I doubt we will be seeing sub $3.50 prices again, until we switch to Hydrogen or Electricity.

                      {"commentId":2863393,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                        #11.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:27 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":2870601,"authorDomain":"cavicore"}

                        gamerk2
                        No, oil is traded as a commodity, not a stock. Since it is a commodity as is gas, you pay what the current price that it is trading at not what it cost to make or what it will cost in a month. Like gold, it to is a commodity and you can get what the current market rate is. If you had a chunk of gold laying around that your great great great granddaddy dug up in the gold rush, you get the current market price, not what it was when it was pulled from the ground.

                        Keep buying the S&D line. You can sell you pick-up or your SUV and go out and buy one of those scam vehicles if you want. Bottom line, when most of the spec money is gone, gas will be at 2 bucks a gallon or less by springtime. And you'll have a $500 month hybrid payment on your hands. Money is driving the price....not S&D.

                        {"commentId":2870601,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"cavicore"}
                          #11.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:19 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          {"commentId":2862715,"authorDomain":"Johnny-Nebraska"}

                          Look folks, the price of gas goes up, everyone blames Bush, the Price of Gas goes down, well it must be because of global market stress and that also is Bush's fault, right? Give me a break. The United States has just experienced a 3.2% increase in its economy, which is the highest in the industrialized word.

                          Transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is going to have a profound impact on oil producing countries that now have to shift down production in order to keep the price of oil profitable for them to pump and transport. This is a transitional economy, these things happen, and those of you who are complaining about things being so bad, obviously have no clue what life was like under Jimmy Carter.

                          As for the investment and futures traders who artificially drove up the price of fuel, they are in London, not the United States where the regulations are still in place regardless of what the news media would like you to believe.

                          It was Bush's announcement that the Executive Ban on off shore drilling was being lifted that caused the much needed tumble, as we started putting asside the "Sky is falling" scare tactics of the liberal left environmental lobby and started to concentrate more on economic stimulation and energy independence. Societal shifts like this occur often in a Democratic Republic and are nothing new. Please remember to conduct yourselves like adults in here.

                          By the way, Al Gore's family has been, is now, and probably will not be in the future, heavily invested in oil.

                          Get a grip folks.

                          George Bush is NOT the Sheriff of Nottingham
                          The Democratic Party is NOT Robin Hood.
                          We do NOT live in Sherwood Forest.

                          Taking money away from people who earned it, and giving it to people who have not, so that we can all feel better about being mediocre is NOT leadership.

                          {"commentId":2862715,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"Johnny-Nebraska"}
                            Reply#12 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":2863145,"authorDomain":"ru4real6846"}

                            Why doesn't this country do something about getting rid of oil. It's ruining our earth, but no one seems to care, and it's because of greed. There are a lot of different means of energy, but yet this country depends on foreign oil. There must be a lot of people who have a lot of stocks in oil. That's why no one does nothing about it. If we don't do something about getting rid of oil, then we won't have to worry about our kids or grand kids growing up. We need to get some young blood in our congress and senate with brains enough to do something about it, because as it is now, nothing is being done.

                            {"commentId":2863145,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"ru4real6846"}
                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#13 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:18 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":2863172,"authorDomain":"mountainwest"}

                            It's the speculators, new-media, oil companies, and politicians that keep the prices up and causing this country to be in a recession. We have plenty of oil in this country, North Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Off Shore, Alaska, etc. We don't need to depend on foreign oil and help them get richer.. Price of oil should be around $85 a barrel or less. I hope we get someone in Office that will stand up for us

                            {"commentId":2863172,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"mountainwest"}
                              Reply#14 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":2863556,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                              Actually, oil was kept artificially cheap in the US for years. This was done intentionally by oil companies in order to keep the US from researching alternatives.

                              The fact prices have spiked shows the the end of oil is far closer than anyone realizes. In my mind, we have <5 years to get off the stuff.

                              And as for the "drill now" mentality, it will take close to a decade to get any working rigs built in the Ocean/Alaska that produce any significant amount of oil. And even if we drill more, we have no capacity to REFINE the oil into gasoline. Refinaries cost $20-$40 Billion on average; thats why the refinaries built in the late 70's are co-owned by multiple companies, because no one entity can afford to build one.

                              In short: You want to spend upwards of $50 Billion and 10 years for a resource we can be off in half the time.

                              If we could instantly extract and refine oil, than most everyone would agree to drill more now until we can get off the stuff. But we can't, and those of us that can understand the underlying issue know that spending more resources drilling for oil is not how we will get out of this mess.

                              We can have production Hydrogen cars ready in 5-7 years, or we can START getting more oil in 10. Which is the better investment?

                              {"commentId":2863556,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #14.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:33 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":2864445,"authorDomain":"rah-1"}

                              "Actually, oil was kept artificially cheap in the US for years. This was done intentionally by oil companies in order to keep the US from researching alternatives." How do you know this? Can you share your resources?

                              {"commentId":2864445,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"rah-1"}
                                #14.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:55 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":2865005,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                                Its called analysis. The rest of the developed world has been paying the equivalent to $5 for gasoline for over a decade now (I'm not talking about most of western Europe, which has price controls to force gas to be expensive).

                                High prices bring competiton. And when a few companies have a monopoly on the market, the one rule to follow is to keep competition from entering the marketplace. People running the oil companies know this, and OPEC does as well.

                                OPEC wants its oil train to go on as long as it can. If high prices lead to a reduction/replacement of oil, they lose a ton of money. As a result, the US has been getting far cheaper gas, in order to prevent alternatives from occuring.

                                What we are paying now is close to the true market value of oil. Its not dropping below $3, thats for sure.

                                {"commentId":2865005,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                                • 1 vote
                                #14.3 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":2865261,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                                Forgot to add this:

                                The cost of a barral of oil when Bush (43) was elected was about $10 a Barral (maybe closer to $15, but it makes the math a bit easier). Oil peaked at about $150 a barral ($147 and change, again, close enough).

                                Supply has been more or less flat, so if prices went up 15 times, that means demand had to rise 15 times as much over seven years.

                                I don't care how much China grows, they didn't multiply the worlds oil demand by 15 times over 7 years. And if the price was all speculation, we would be seeing far more volatility in the price on any given day.

                                Use that with my above reasoning, and you understand why i think its clear that the price of oil has been kept low on purpose.

                                {"commentId":2865261,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                                • 1 vote
                                #14.4 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:18 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":2863255,"authorDomain":"mlittlejohn"}

                                The question "just how stupid is our government" is self condemning. The "government" is elected by and representative of the American people. If the government is stupid, then so are the American people. And I concur with that conclusion. Americans are basically selfish and stupid people. We have ruined a once superior educational system. We have squandered our wealth and our military resources. We are fast becoming a third rate country, just as Great Britain did after WWII. So, be careful about blaming our problems on the government. How about just blaming ourselves for the innate stupidity that comes with an overabundance of resources. We deserve what we get, and what we are now getting is mainly financial ruin.

                                {"commentId":2863255,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"mlittlejohn"}
                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#15 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":2927176,"authorDomain":"techie22"}

                                You are absolutely right. Unfortunately, the stupid people's

                                voting habits effect even those of us who know better.

                                Hopefully they give someone with a brain a chance to start

                                correcting all the inane decisions made by this administration.

                                {"commentId":2927176,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"techie22"}
                                  #15.1 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
                                  Reply
                                  {"commentId":2863375,"authorDomain":"kengrubbs"}

                                  Having been in oil and gas exploration for the last 33 years I am amazed at the ignorance of the media and the public about the realities of the oil business. First and formost trying to blame prices and price change on "Big Oil" is not only ignorant but counterproductive. "Big Oil is a convienent Catch All bogeyman for politicians and the media to blame when oil prices rapidly increase. "Big Oil" (Conoco, Shell, Exxon, BP, Chevron) are small players in US oil production and smaller players overseas. They control something like 5% of the worlds oil supply so blaming them for all Americas problems may be convienent but it sure doesn't change anything. Most of the oil industry in the US (all those 10-20000 Co's) that produce the lion's share of the oil and gas must sure work hard to put competition aside and collaberate to increase oil prices.

                                  The blame lies with the American people who expected their birth right (all the oil and gas they could use) to be virtually free for the past 50 years and to be priced the same on into the future. Do the American people (or the world as a whole) realize that cheap energy powers or creates virtually everything they use, live in or eat.

                                  Let me assure you that after exploring for the stuff for 30+ years it is not easy to find and there are no easy magic bullets (200 year oil supply in Alaska, oil shales, etc) that will fix all our problems overnight.

                                  You don't get something for nothing in this world and reality is very far from what the media and politicians will tell you. The answer lies in conservation of existing energy sources and flexibility to access and develop new energy sources. Wind and solar will not provide the country's energy alone, all types of energy must be developed any we must learn to use all that energy wisely. (Does using oil to make throw away water bottles sound like a good use for that $140 /BBL oil that we borrowed money from the Chinese to pay the Venezuelans for ?)

                                  {"commentId":2863375,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"kengrubbs"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#16 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":2863644,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                                  Honest question for you (assuming no ND agreements and such):

                                  How much oil exists in Alaska/Gulf of Mexico that we can drill for, how soon can we get it, and how much can we expect to get PER DAY (I don't care about how much there is if we can't drill it up quickly enough to affect the prices at the pump).

                                  And in your opinion, would we be better of (long term, even if it will cause some pain) focusing on alternatives?

                                  {"commentId":2863644,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #16.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:36 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":2867891,"authorDomain":"itgranny"}

                                  KG-514903-
                                  I disagree with your statement. It comes off like "dumb Americans should have known".

                                  At the same time, Suburbans were rolling off the assembly lines and advertised on TV like mad. People were cheered on as being really ambitious for driving 60 miles one way to work. People got on planes and flew all over the place without much effort to do business over the phone.

                                  Back in the Carter years, they were really getting into energy conservation. There was a 30 year plan and had we kept it up, we would probably all be driving electric cars and we wouldn't be in the mess we're in.

                                  Car companies, oil companies, media and many others led us to believe that there was never a problem and it was OK to use, use, use because that's what made them richer. It's not the average Joe's fault. His/her job is to fix the plumbing, wiring, build houses, raise food etc. That's where they are the experts. It's the greed of corporate America. If they saw a bit of extra money in it, by hook or by crook, they were going to stick it to us. Ethical or not.

                                  If we're going to allow corporate America to call the shots and lead us, they darn well better make a conscious decision to lead us in the right direction.

                                  {"commentId":2867891,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"itgranny"}
                                  • 1 vote
                                  #16.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":2869256,"authorDomain":"cyan412000"}

                                  gamerk2:
                                  its said there is enough oil in the north slope of alaska alone to fuel this country for the next 200 years.

                                  it is also said the wells are drilled and capped...so to bring it online a few months. to actually get oil from to OCS. maybe a year. your talking about a nation that during WW2 was able to get it beaten up and sunk battleships up and going in a few months.

                                  if we really had to get to it in a hurry we could.

                                  {"commentId":2869256,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"cyan412000"}
                                    #16.3 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":2876807,"authorDomain":"nhpawildfire"}

                                    I fully agree with your statements about the discovery and refining of crude oil.. I also do not believe that the other oil producing nations are entirely responsible for the high cost..

                                    If the high cost of gas and heating oil was based on supply and demand the prices would not change almost on a daily basis.. To be sure the prices would increase but at a much slower pace.. I place the blame squarely on the speculators - seeking massive profits and hurting the consuming public.. Let's face it - there is no competition for fuels that is reasonable at this time nor is there any really strong push to create an alternative..

                                    Regardless of opinions to the contrary - I wonder why it took so long for studies to prove what most of us have been saying since gas headed into orbit months ago.. I also wonder exactly what our congresscritters are going to do to reverse it - and to make sure it never happens again.. While I'm at it I am curious to find out how many of our elected officials received campaign contributions from oil companies - Wall Street trading firms - and associated lobbiests in any way or form.. Be it "soft money" or any other type of support...

                                    {"commentId":2876807,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"nhpawildfire"}
                                      #16.4 - Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:02 AM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      {"commentId":2863617,"authorDomain":"c-opall"}

                                      Time to reign in the investor class. There is an unchallenged assumption that free-flowing investment capital is good for the long-term economic health of our nation. Therefore, investments should be unregulated and investment profits should be untaxed. If such things are not unregulated and untaxed, as the assumption goes, then investors will take their money elsewhere (Either play the game the way they want it played or they will take their ball and go home).

                                      I think that what has happened recently in the housing and oil markets demonstrates that the investment class, unregulated and untaxed, and driven by greed as opposed to being driven by reason and a desire to produce and expand, will drive the rest of us into the ground if given the opportunity. And they will do so without sympathy or apology.

                                      No, I have lost faith in the free-wheeling, get-rich-quick investment class. Time to regulate them and tax them. Don't worry about them taking them money elsewhere. Remember when the credit crisis first hit last summer? All the pundits and experts and all of the investment news shows recommended putting money into China, Brazil, India, and Russia. They took their money out of the Amercan economy anyway.

                                      {"commentId":2863617,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"c-opall"}
                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#17 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:36 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":2864778,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                                      In science, for a theory to hold true, it must be true at the medians and the extremes. Therefore, if lower taxes result in more growth, a 0% tax rate would provide the maximum amount of growth for the economy, and as a result, a larger cash stockpile for the government.

                                      As such a policy would bankrupt the government, it is clear that the assumption Republicans have about the economy are wrong. And thats before you factor in Coorporate greed and mismanagement.

                                      In fact the last 3 Republican presidants have been economic disasters, by any impartial observation:

                                      Regan: 4 Trillion in debt was added under him, and the Savings and Loans crysis (although he's the only one of the three who succedded in making the economy grow at a decent rate).
                                      Bush (41): Had to raise taxes to fight deficit Regan left
                                      Bush (43): Added another 4 Trillion to the deficit, Housing and Credit market collapse (still in progress)

                                      Yep, Republicans know how to run the economy...

                                      {"commentId":2864778,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                                        #17.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":2863675,"authorDomain":"avc3"}

                                        Let's put the blame where it really belongs. The Republicans want to drill for more oil. The Democrats do not. Therefore, the Repblicans will not pass legislation to stop speculation.

                                        Sort of reminds me of the LBO craze in the mid to late 1980's, followed by the Enron and Worldcom era and now energy speculation. Congress has the authority and moral imperative to regulate these types of speculation by adjusting the tax code if nothing else.

                                        Of course, recognizing what the opposite of progress is, can we be too surprised?

                                        {"commentId":2863675,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"avc3"}
                                          Reply#18 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":2864409,"authorDomain":"gamerk2"}

                                          Republicans also blocked legislation that would have put a stop to speculation in the commodity markets (which used to be illegial anyway...).

                                          Last I heard, they were stopping a troop funding bill from passing until they got the right to drill in parts of Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. Not sure how that turned out though (I'm at work now; I haven't caught up on the news yet). Isn't it ironic though that now its the Republicans from blocking troop funding bills?

                                          {"commentId":2864409,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gamerk2"}
                                            #18.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":2863678,"authorDomain":"dcidan"}

                                            Why????? Come on America, you have LYING, CHEATING, CRIMINALS, in the WHITE HOUSE. BUSH, CHANEY and the rest of the criminal mob along with THEIR OIL COMPANY CRONIES sticking it to us in every crack and crevice we have. The only supply and demand there is, is for them (OUR CORRUPT LEADERS) to DEMAND WE SUPPLY THEM WITH MORE MONEY while they give tax breaks to the oil companies who haven't even attempted to drill on the millions of acres they already have. And why not??? They know there is plenty of supply and are just reaping the HUGE STOLEN PROFITS we have been forced to hand over!!!!! AND, if you think McCain is any different along with the RIGHT WING IDIOT running as V.P. you better get your head examined FAST before it's to late.

                                            {"commentId":2863678,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"dcidan"}
                                            • 1 vote
                                            Reply#19 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
                                            {"commentId":2864319,"authorDomain":"rah-1"}

                                            I take it you wanted Hillary instead of Barack? Seriously you blame lying cheating admin of Bush.... speculation is what I say drives the oil market, but just my opinion.

                                            {"commentId":2864319,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"rah-1"}
                                              #19.1 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":2865839,"authorDomain":"canddkelly"}

                                              How many times has everyone seen the the term, or one like it, Bush's oil buddies? Usually used in the context of him getting them rich. I have never seen one of their names printed. I do know of one person getting rich off the oil (scare) market: Al Gore. He's made a cool $100 million since he left office, mainly by scaring people about fossil fuels and their side effects.

                                              {"commentId":2865839,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"canddkelly"}
                                                #19.2 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:38 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":2865862,"authorDomain":"dcidan"}

                                                NO not really, I'm fine with Barack. I do agree with you on speculation. My comments on the white house crooks were meant to mean they know it's the speculators and have done nothing about it but LIE!! There is plenty of other lies and B.S. they feed us on a daily basis.

                                                {"commentId":2865862,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"dcidan"}
                                                  #19.3 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:39 PM EDT
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":2864474,"authorDomain":"teeminus1"}

                                                  The stone age did not end because we ran out of stones. We do not need to run out of oil before we find some other kind of energy. We need to get on with the ET (energy technology) and then the chinas and indias of the world will be beating a path to our door. We can not "drill baby drill" our way out of this problem. When gas hit 4.25 a gal, GM woke up and said we are no longer building suv and big trucks, you could not find a hybrid, everybody wants to do something, so the oil is coming back down maybe even to 80 a barrel. gas will come down and the American public will stick it's head back in the sand.

                                                  {"commentId":2864474,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"teeminus1"}
                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  Reply#20 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 3:56 PM EDT
                                                  {"commentId":2864694,"authorDomain":"jdonnelly"}

                                                  Both parties are against the common man, we are as parasites to them and they have no problem eradicating us by whatever means possible.
                                                  The way you hurt them is through the wallet, go back to the bare necessities and stop spending all of our monies.
                                                  If it is gas your spending it on drive less, food eat less, we can all cut back to some degree.
                                                  I believe most of us have already started doing this, it is starting to show in the weak numbers coming out.....call me a bad American for thinking this way.

                                                  {"commentId":2864694,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"jdonnelly"}
                                                    Reply#21 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:01 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":2865213,"authorDomain":"njbayside"}

                                                    My broker told me to jump into the oil market in May of 07, I did. to the tune of 110k, In my 40 yrs of investing I made more money in the last 12 months then the 40 years before. He was a jerk to do what he and "ALL " of his buddies did at msdw buy we all walked away with a bundle of money. 387K. Greed does pay, as long as you can live with yourself

                                                    {"commentId":2865213,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"njbayside"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#22 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:16 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":2865513,"authorDomain":"tbernard"}

                                                    One issue I do not see discussed; is that most oil companies "hedge" at least half of their production to protect against significant negative price variations. The result is the "oil purchaser"/"buyer"; who purchases the oil product from the oil companies (not the oil companies), reaps the windfall when we experience escalated prices as we recently have. There is no doubt nor alternative that speculators generated the recent price volatility partly from greed and secondly from fear of the escalating prices they were themselves generated. While we may never see parity between the mmbtu factors of crude oil vs natural gas due to transportation and political issues (1:6 ratio); consumers of mmbtu's will force a more honest picture by switching between fuel sources when possible.

                                                    {"commentId":2865513,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"tbernard"}
                                                      Reply#23 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:26 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":2865534,"authorDomain":"gulfdigger"}

                                                      I read the comments in the blog, about american getting screwed by the so called high prices of gasoline, just maybe they should go to Europe or Australia and just see how bad the poor souls are getting screwed over. I see the price of oil going up again soon. Just remember at the rate of usage, the world only has a estimated 42.5 years of oil left. So as each year that rolls by and nothing is done for another form of energy, that gallon of gas will have the price as Drinking Water in the Desert.

                                                      {"commentId":2865534,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"gulfdigger"}
                                                        Reply#24 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":2865591,"authorDomain":"bernhardmeck"}

                                                        The Real Estate market collapsed after the brokers and peddlers of dubious financing took that cash-cow for all it was worth. The consumers are still falling off the financial cliff like lemmings, unable to get out of the rut. One disaster isn't even played out yet, when the next one hit with runaway energy costs. The big players who made all the cash in the first round had looked real quick and found a new target for riches and that was commodities. Not just oil, let's raid food commodities too. Take no prisoners! The few big shots who are running and manipulating all these 'funds' have long taken their bounty's cut and made off as the latest house-of-cards began to fold. With all the billions syphoned, looted and skimmed off this unethical but legal scheme, one would think they now need time to blow it all. Hell how much champagne and lobster can a Type-A personality consume before that gets boring? I'm afraid the modern-day counterparts of the 'profiteers/pirates' of the Caribbean will be back for more... just what will the target be next? Anybody want to take bets? Maybe we can cut them off before the next gorging of the beasts. Maybe getting off-the-grid, off-the-credit, becoming frugal and expecting the worst will become the new American adaptation to these predatory/parasitic life-forms. Kinda like retreating to the fortress and leaving the tempting clutter outside.

                                                        {"commentId":2865591,"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784","authorDomain":"bernhardmeck"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#25 - Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:29 PM EDT
                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"354082","isPrivate":false}
                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                        {"threadId":"354082","contentId":"1849784"}
                                                        Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                        Stop TrackingStop Tracking